• Saint George |
  • Cedar City |
  • Mesquite

  • More
  • More
  • More
  • How The Range War Hit Home In Utah
    by Carin Miller
    Published - 04/12/14 - 02:38 PM | 5 5 comments | 34 34 recommendations | email to a friend | print
    (SOUTHERN, Utah) – The sleeping giant that woke at the dawn of the Nevada Range War, stretched his massive hand from the corners of Southern, Utah to expose the hypocrisy of the federal governments actions just one state over.

    In the past 10 days, resolutions were issued from at least two Southern Utah counties to the Bureau of Land Management. One April 3 by the Washington County Commission urging the BLM to restrain from transporting confiscated cattle belonging to Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy through their county and into the state of Utah for distribution. The other resolution, issued by the Iron County Commission, called the BLM out for mismanaging Iron County public lands and allowing the wild horse population to grow to more than twice the legal limit.

    Iron County Commissioner David Miller said that he believes what is good for the goose should also be good for the gander. He said he wanted to understand why the BLM was enforcing laws one state over, when they were breaking them in Iron County, Utah.

    “To dismiss our request to manage these animals as one charged to manage them and to interfere with US citizens historical rights to graze in Nevada comes at a great alarm in Iron County,” the notice served alongside of the Iron County resolution reported. It went on to say that, the action of removing Bundy Cattle from public lands was in-and-of-itself a “direct opposition” of responses to requests made by Iron County for the BLM to get the wild horse population under control.

    The two-page resolution established a plan of action carried out by county commissioners and the Iron County Sheriff’s Department to handle the wild horse population issue in Iron County themselves. It stated that the problem has become one of imminent danger to ranchers who count on that land, and have paid grazing fees associated with land use, but due to overgrowth of the wild horse population cannot support the needs of their livestock.

    It went on to say that based on Utah code 11-51-102-103 Iron County has the authority to act on behalf of their citizens when the controlling agency is out of compliance to the detriment of Iron County’s people.

    According to the BLM website found at www.blm.gov the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act mandates that was “necessary” to take action against any overpopulation that exists on public lands, by rounding up said animals and removing them from public lands. It went on to say this was an essential duty in order to maintain appropriate land management requirements and that the action should be immediate.

    Miller said that for the past few years the BLM has refused to deal with the abundant horse population citing financial restraints due to funding cuts from above. He said he finds it fascinating, and even a little bit offensive, that the BLM cannot acquire funds to manage public lands in Utah, but can find millions of dollars to confiscate trespass cattle in Nevada.

    “If we really believe that we are a country of laws, like I have heard over and over from the BLM – then number one, they better abide by their own damned laws,” he said. “And second, they had better abide by the very founding of the law of the land that give all other law any legitimacy.”

    Citing both the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Article 1; Section 8; phrase 17, Miller said that the BLM’s actions in the state of Nevada are not only questionable, but given their stance on the Iron County wild horse issues in conjunction with that action, they are unlawful as well.

    “In response to challenges of federal ownership of the lands in Nevada – the 9th circuit held that the federal government owned all federal lands in Nevada and that those lands did not pass to the state upon statehood,” said BLM Public Affairs Specialist Kirsten Cannon.

    She said that Bundy’s cattle was lawfully confiscated pursuant the issuance of two separate federal court orders asking him to remove his cattle from public lands.

    Since the issuance the letter of intent and the resolution, Miller said they have met with local BLM officials, but he said he the outcome was discouraging. He said local representatives claimed they did not have any authority to gather horses without permission from superior agents from within the agency.

    “They come in with a spirit of cooperation,” Miller said. “But they are completely powerless to mitigate the concerns that we’ve got.”

    Cannon said that she could not comment on anything beyond what was taking place on the public lands in Nevada, because that was not her division.

    Attempts by KCSG to contact Iron County BLM representatives have been unsuccessful, and the BLM has not issued a press release in response.

    However, National Park Service spokesperson Christie Vanover said the NPS and BLM have taken concerns raised about transporting Bundy cattle into Utah for distribution very seriously.

    Washington County’s unanimously passed resolution stated that the feral cattle that could potentially be herded along with Bundy cattle could be of strong consequence to Utah ranchers livestock, and for that reason it urged the BLM to keep the sale of confiscated cattle within the boundaries of Nevada.

    Washington County Commissioner Jim Eardley said they were standing in support of Iron, Beaver and Sevier Counties, all of whom he said were opposed to the interstate exchange of the Bundy Cattle. He said that it was his understanding that auction houses in the state of Nevada had refused to sell confiscated cattle, and the closest option they could find was in Monroe, Utah.

    Eardley said that the problem with feral cattle coming in to Utah’s rancher community is that they haven’t been properly cared for, or immunized, so they pose health threats to healthy animals.

    Vanover said that the BLM has received letters from the Utah governor’s office, county commissions and concerned Utahans, and they have reevaluated their initial plans to transport cattle into the state.

    “They have been in direct contact as well with a lot of our agency administrators here,” she said. “So, we did have initial plans in place, and we are taking into account the concerns of all of the citizens involved and they’re looking at different options.”

    She said the BLM had no plans of shipping confiscated Bundy cattle anywhere at all in the immediate future, but would not disclose where the cattle was being held.

    Comments
    (5)
    Comments-icon Post a Comment
    anonam
    |
    April 15, 2014
    this is a property right issue. The Feds meaning 300M people in America own the land unless you have a time machine to go back and homestead it, so the agency in charge has a right to move the cattle, The BLM is a slow acting agency with lots of public meetings where the 300M people can have a voice. those cattle have impacted the range for the last 25 years negatively I am sure Mr. Bundy didn't concern himself with removing them before they started eating dirt. The horses in Iron County have nothing to do with the Bundy thing. Mississippi thought they could segregate schools and tell the feds to get lost they found out they were wrong the cowboys will found this out too.
    Userrname
    |
    April 14, 2014
    If they can't be ever ridden they should be slaughtered for meat, since they will only use up government resources. If they can be broken, they should be sold for people to ride. Of course some should be left to run wild as well. The overpopulation should be a good opportunity to get cheap horses but only if the government allows it.
    Susan Humphrey
    |
    April 12, 2014
    The BLM needs to get its own house in order by removing the 14,000 excess feral horses and selling the 50,000 unadoptable horses it is warehousing in long and short term pastures. That is the law and they admit they are not in compliance. wild horse advocates can buy the horses at public auction if they are worried about them going to slaughter. The BLM has allocated grazing for 26,000 of them; that is plenty. They are no different than the feral pigs running loose in the southern states...but you don't find activists trying to keep them from being hunted. On the contrary, hunting feral pigs gets a show on T.V.
    Kelly Green
    |
    April 13, 2014
    You're an idiot! You have no idea.I work with these horses. What your saying is let them sold to slaughter because thats what will happen!
    Sho
    |
    April 15, 2014
    and this is based on what extensive amount of research and critical analysis? Your ignorance baffles me.
    Loading
    Submit an Event