• Saint George |
  • Cedar City |
  • Mesquite

  • More
  • More
  • More
  • Group of 15 Senators and House Members Argue that Mandate Violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
    by kcsg.com news
    Published - 01/28/14 - 08:50 AM | 0 0 comments | 20 20 recommendations | email to a friend | print
    Religious Freedom
    Religious Freedom
    slideshow
    (WASHINGTON, D.C.) - In advance of the Supreme Court hearing a case concerning the contraception mandate implemented as part of the President’s health law, a group of 15 Members of Congress who voted for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) filed a legal brief with the court today arguing that that the mandate violates RFRA. The mandate requires that women’s contraception, including abortifacient drugs, be covered by all health insurance plans. RFRA was signed into law in 1993 by Democrat President Bill Clinton after passing Congress overwhelmingly in 1993 (by a 97-3 vote in the Senate, and unanimously in the House).

    The brief, led by U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a current member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary who was the lead Republican sponsor of RFRA, was filed in a case combining two legal challenges to the contraceptive mandate by private businesses who operate consistent with their owners’ religious principles – a suit brought by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and a separate suit brought by Conestoga Wood Specialties. In the Hobby Lobby case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled that the contraceptive mandate violates the company’s free exercise of religion, while the 3rd Circuit ruled that Conestoga Wood Specialties’ rights were not violated.

    “It’s unfortunate but not surprising that the Obama Administration continues to trample on the religious freedoms Americans hold dear, and the contraceptive mandate is a sad example of that,” Hatch said. “Just last week the Supreme Court ruled that some religious organizations are exempt from the mandate, but why not all? Religious freedom should not be a political issue. It is one of our country’s founding principles, and I’m hopeful that the Supreme Court will reconfirm that our country will not stand for forcing one’s beliefs onto others who may morally object to them.”

    In the brief, the authors write that, “The government’s refusal to apply RFRA throughout the administrative process has resulted in a mandate that violates RFRA and turns the law of religious freedom upside down. RFRA places a heavy burden on the government and protects religion by default. But the [Health and Human Services] mandate places a heavy burden on religion and protects the government by default.”

    In addition to Hatch, the brief was signed by Sens. Dan Coats (R-Ind.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), John McCain (R-Az.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Pat Roberts (R-Kans.) and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), and Reps. Bob Goodlatte (VA-06), Lamar Smith (TX-21), Chris Smith (NJ-04) and Frank Wolf (VA-10

    Comments
    (0)
    Comments-icon Post a Comment
    No Comments Yet
    Loading
    Submit an Event